Casualization in Academic Philosophy:
A SWIP UK Panel at the Hypatia 2015 Conference Exploring Collaborative Contestations
Venue: Villanova University, Pennsylvania
Dates: 28-30 May 2015
There is at least anecdotal evidence that casualizationâ€”increased use of adjuncts, part-time and temporary academic facultyâ€”disproportionately disadvantages members of underrepresented groups (women, working class academics, disabled academics). For example women, on average, are more likely to have carer responsibilities during their careers, and are on average more likely to be the more junior members of their marriages/partnership, career- and earnings-wise; and because of this are often less mobile and less able to take up insecure temporary employment than their male counterparts.
We would like to explore the implications of this for academic philosophy. Should we conceptualise casualization as an equality issue, or is casualizationâ€™s disproportionate affect on women and other underrepresented groups better understood as simply a knock-on effect of wider social inequality? Can we justify the hiring of adjuncts and temporary teaching cover even in the face of inequality concerns? What could departments do to counteract the exclusionary effects of casualization? What structural aims should we have, in the academy, in order to foster equality â€˜from the insideâ€™? What would structurally-inclusive academic hiring practices look like, optimally or in the ideal?
Katharine Jenkins, University of Sheffield
Lindsey Porter, University of Sheffield
Komarine Romdenh-Romluc, University of Nottingham
Site Content © SWIP UK. All rights reserved.